How does Roman architecture differ from Greek architecture quizlet?
How does Roman architecture differ from Greek architecture? Greeks aimed for simple elegance whereas the Romans emphasized grandeur. Romans used cement to make domes and improved structural devices such as columns and arches.
How did Roman temples differ from Greek temples?
What was the first difference? Roman temples were built on an elevated plateau with a big staircase in front, but Greek temples were built on a stylobate with a staircase of only three steps.
How was the ancient Roman family organized quizlet?
How was the ancient Roman family organized? The father had complete control over all members of the family. … Roman women had many more rights than other women of the time.
What is unique about Roman architecture?
Roman architecture made use of arches, vaulting, and concrete to enable interior space to be much larger in its buildings. Prior to this, ancient Greek, Persian, Egyptian, and Etruscan architecture relied on heavy support on the interior of buildings which meant small rooms and limited design on the interior.
What were the Greek and Roman temples used for?
Temples were frequently used to store votive offerings. They are the most important and most widespread building type in Greek architecture. In the Hellenistic kingdoms of Southwest Asia and of North Africa, buildings erected to fulfil the functions of a temple often continued to follow the local traditions.
How were Etruscan temples and Greek temples similar and different?
Etruscan temples rested on a podium that was only accessible from steps at the front instead of from steps on all sides like Greek temples. Absence of a peristyle. Etruscan temples had columns only on the front rather than a peristyle around all four sides as many Greek temples did.